7 Comments
User's avatar
Freedom350's avatar

That might be the whole point. Remove access to a proven vaccine and promote one that doesn’t exist. Result: no vaccine.

joni's avatar

So nerve-wracking and perplexing. What is the end game ?

Is this another attempt to "cull the herd" ?

Frumious Bandersnatch's avatar

Yes, every domestic action of this regime should be seen through a eugenicist lens. They are trying to eliminate sick children, the elderly and the disabled, and it's only going to accelerate.

Kim Boucher's avatar

But here they are not eliminating sick children; they are creating them.

Frumious Bandersnatch's avatar

These mandates will fall hardest on children whose health is already compromised in some way. This regime has already handwaved away the deaths of children from measles because "they were already sick". Basically, those kids' deaths were 'freebies' because they were going to die anyway, so they don't matter and shouldn't be taken into account.

Kim Boucher's avatar

What does this accomplish? I usually can see the trumpian end goal, but not this time. I don't get it.

And then the stephen-miller-ghoul chimed in that childhood vaccines have not been studied. What an ignoramus. Does he not read Tom Wellborn?

Lupatrian's avatar

Hey Congress: Is he batshit enough yet‽

Trump is a sadist and this is another means for him to inflict suffering for his own sick amusement. (See William Sascha Riley's account of Trump V. puppies.) The wealthy will have easy access to everything they need and this will thin out the rest of us.