PolitiMix: Kill Notes 💰

Kill Notes #11: Hitler the Socialist, the Deposition He Isn't Avoiding, the Fraudulent Schoolteacher, the Starlink He Put Back, and the Bank Hacks That Weren't

Tom Wellborn — Sun, 25 Oct 2026 12:23:17 GMT

The usual terms. Five claims you likely saw this week, what happened when each was checked, and what was true underneath. Three came from the right, one from the left, and one from a lawyer. The week’s pattern is at the end, and it is the strangest one this column has had, because no outside source was required to kill any of them.

1. Hitler was a far-left socialist.

The claim. On Friday, Elon Musk quoted a French account that had been complaining about getting “history lessons” in its replies and added: “Hitler was a far left socialist. Literally in the name of his party!” He has more than 200 million followers and the post went where his posts go.

What happened when it was checked. The check was performed by Grok, the AI his company builds and his platform runs, when a user asked it whether the “socialist” in the party’s name was anything other than Nazi propaganda. Grok answered within the hour: “Nazis added ‘socialist’ to their name as propaganda to lure workers from actual leftist parties.” It went on that Hitler rejected Marxism, banned unions, jailed socialists and communists, and “killed his own party’s left wing in 1934,” and that “Mainstream historians place Nazism on the far right.” A second user asked it why its owner was spreading the claim. Grok cited Kershaw, Evans, Britannica and the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, and added a sentence that deserves to outlive the week: “No owner dictates facts.”

What was true underneath. The name. The German Workers’ Party added “National Socialist” in 1920 to compete with the Social Democrats and the Communists for the same factory floors, and then spent the next thirteen years destroying both. On May 2, 1933, the SA occupied every trade union office in the country, and the unions were dissolved the following day. The first prisoners marched into Dachau in March 1933 were Communists and Social Democrats. On June 30, 1934, Gregor Strasser, the leader of the party’s anti-capitalist wing, was shot through the window of his cell during the purge that also killed Röhm. Otto Strasser had been expelled four years earlier for taking the word socialist seriously. The name survived because it was never a description, which is the point Grok made in fewer words, to its owner, on his own product.

Subscribe now

Kill Notes #10: The Starlink Switch, the Repealed Sanctions, the Tiger Montage, the Punch That Wasn't Photographed, and the Maricopa Apology

Tom Wellborn — Sun, 18 Oct 2026 13:19:38 GMT

Last week’s pattern was addition. This week’s is substitution. Somebody took a true sentence, changed one noun or one verb, and sent it on its way with the wrong part improved. The exercise below is to put the original word back. In four of five cases, the sentence gets uglier when you do. The fifth is the exception, and it’s the only item this week that was built from nothing at all.

Musk shut off Starlink for Ukraine

The claim, from Wednesday morning onward: Elon Musk turned off Starlink for the Ukrainian military while Russia was hitting Kyiv’s power plants. Some versions had him “pulling the plug,” most had the word “shut,” and a lot of them tied it to the Russian diesel deal the president had announced the week before.

What happened when it was checked. Two words are wrong, and they’re the two that matter. The first is “shut.” Nothing was turned off. On the night of October 13, Starshield, the military package built on Starlink and paid for by the Pentagon, stopped connecting for any terminal moving faster than 100 miles an hour. Below that, it worked, with glitches. Zelensky corrected the internet himself on Thursday: “Starlink wasn’t turned off,” he wrote on X, “its speed was reduced.” The cap hit exactly one thing, the interceptor and strike drones that fly faster than 100 miles an hour, which is to say the drones Ukraine uses against Russia’s jet-powered Shaheds.

The second wrong word is “Musk.” He said on X that the limits on Starshield “are decided by the US military and ultimately POTUS,” which everyone read as a dodge. Then Reuters reported, from two US officials and a Western one, that the order came from inside the White House and the Pentagon was told to carry it out. A senior official’s only correction was that it hadn’t come from the president personally. The president’s own account: “It wasn’t me, and I don’t think it was Elon.” Axios had US officials calling it a “technical malfunction.” Those three explanations can’t all be true, and the one with named sources is Reuters.

What was true underneath. The cap is still on. Service was reported “restored” Thursday, and what came back was the connection below 100 miles an hour. Zelensky said Saturday the limit remains, called it a “planned operation,” and described the test his people ran: they drove terminals across the border into the EU, and the cap lifted at the line. Thom Tillis has asked the Pentagon’s inspector general to find out whether it was “a conscious decision to clear the field for a Russian attack.” So the corrected sentence reads: the White House capped Ukraine’s drone defenses the night Russia fired 39 ballistic missiles at Kyiv, nobody will say who signed it, and it’s still capped. The version that traveled had the wrong man doing a thing that didn’t happen. The real version has the wrong building doing a thing that’s still going on.

Subscribe now

Kill Notes #09: Nuke Los Angeles, the Wrong Arena, Whatever He Wants, the Lifelong Vegan, and the Golden Throne

Tom Wellborn — Sun, 11 Oct 2026 13:04:53 GMT

The pattern this week is addition. The president said a thing, the thing was bad, and by the time it reached your feed somebody had added a word, a target, a venue, or an entire vision of the apocalypse. The additions were unnecessary in every case, which is the finding worth keeping. What follows is what he said, what got added, and what was underneath once the additions were removed.

Trump told Iran to nuke Los Angeles and San Diego

The claim, from Monday night onward, in a hundred variations: the president told Iran to nuke Los Angeles and San Diego. Some versions had him “inviting” the attack, some had him “begging” for it, and the word nuke was in most of them. A reader of this publication asked on Tuesday morning whether it was real, because it did not sound like a thing a president could say and still be president on Wednesday.

What happened when it was checked. The transcript, from ABC7 and matching CNN and Mediaite, is of the Grand Island, Nebraska, rally on Monday, in the section about the cost of the war. The president said gas prices were “just artificial” and “a little bit high,” and then “a small price to pay for keeping the world safe.” Then: “They can take out a city.” “Let them take out Los Angeles.” “Let them take out San Diego.” “This is a very small price to pay.” The crowd applauded at the names.

So the quote is real, and the two cities are real, and the applause is real. What is missing is the word nuke, which he did not say, and the address, because he was not speaking to Iran. He was making an argument to a Nebraska crowd that a high gas price is cheap insurance against a hostile power that “can take out a city,” and he reached for two California cities as examples of what could be taken. The grammar is the grammar of a hypothetical. The sound in the room was the sound of an imperative, which is why the governor of California and both senators and the mayors of both cities heard it the way the crowd did.

What was true underneath. Two things. First, the capability he described does not exist: Iran’s longest-range missiles reach about 2,000 kilometers, Los Angeles is about 12,000 from Tehran, and no intelligence service credits Iran with a nuclear weapon or anything that reaches this hemisphere. The hypothetical was built on a threat the president’s own war is supposed to have ended. Second, and this is the one to keep, a president named two American cities as the ones an enemy could take out, called their loss a small price, and got a cheer for it, in a week when San Diego’s own carrier was coming home from that war. The nuke was added by the internet. The rest he supplied himself.

Subscribe now

Kill Notes #08: No Fatties, Troops at the Polls, Nixon Was Framed, the Little Things, and Canada's Election Plot

Tom Wellborn — Sun, 04 Oct 2026 13:29:14 GMT

Last week's claims were true facts wearing a word they had not earned. This week's are simpler and in some ways worse, because every one of them rests on a recording. A defense secretary's speech was transcribed. A president sat for a magazine interview that the magazine published in full. A vice president spoke on camera. A trade adviser spoke into a microphone. And a former president, fifty-four years ago, recorded himself in the Oval Office, which turns out to be the transcript that still decides the most. The job this week is to find the sentence each claim was built on and read what sits on either side of it. In one case the sentence is exactly as ugly as advertised. In the other four, the sentence is real and the claim is a reading of it, and the reading is the part that traveled.

Hegseth said “no fatties, no trannies”

The claim, everywhere from Wednesday night: the Secretary of War stood in front of several hundred officers at Quantico and said the military would have “no fatties, no trannies.” A fair number of readers took it for a paraphrase, a parody account, or a France 24 translation gone wrong, and a fair number of this publication’s readers asked whether it was real, because last week this publication could only trace it to a headline.

What happened when it was checked. It is real, and it is longer. The Rev transcript of the September 30 address, at the six-minute mark, has the secretary saying the department is “no longer the woke department or the weak department,” and then offering what he called a simple translation: “no fatties, no trannies, no beardos, no weirdos, no wimps, no radicals, just warriors.” The audience, by every account in the room, was silent. The same speech, per the Associated Press, directed every service to double the ten percent cut in general and admiral positions he ordered last spring, to twenty percent of roughly 800 slots, complete by January 1, 2027, and announced a study of the future of warfare led by Elon Musk, Palmer Luckey, and Newt Gingrich, due in 120 days. The “no fatties” line was the one that traveled. The other two were the policy.

What was true underneath. All of it, which is the unusual finding this week. The quote is verbatim, the list is longer than the version that circulated, and the person who said it runs the department prosecuting a war in its eighth month. Readers who want to use it should use the full seven-item list, because “no beardos, no weirdos” is the part that tells you the register the secretary was speaking in, and because the complete sentence is harder to wave off as a clip. The transcript is public. Anyone who tells you he did not say it has not read it.

Subscribe now

Kill Notes #07: The Voter Purge, the All-Time Low, the Humiliation at the White House, and the Word "China"

Tom Wellborn — Sun, 27 Sep 2026 14:16:13 GMT

Last week’s claims were false things built on real facts. This week’s are harder to handle, because none of them is false. Each one is a real event with a single word attached that the event did not earn: a ruling became a purge, a poll became an all-time low, a repeated sentence became a humiliation, and an intelligence assessment about “Chinese groups” became China. The job this week is to find the word, take it off, and see what is left standing, because in every case what is left is worth more than the version that traveled.

The voter purge the Supreme Court just approved

The claim, from both directions at once. On the left, since Friday: the Supreme Court has cleared Trump to purge noncitizens from the voter rolls before the midterms. NBC’s headline said the Court allowed the administration to use the database “for potential voter purges,” and smaller outlets dropped the word potential. On the right, the same ruling ran as the Court “granting states the ability to verify voter status in the midterm election,” and the Department of Homeland Security put out a release applauding it.

What happened when it was checked. On Friday the Court issued an unsigned order pausing a June lower-court ruling that had blocked the expanded SAVE system, with Justice Jackson dissenting. That is a stay rather than a decision on the merits; the case continues on appeal. SAVE is the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements database, built to check eligibility for public benefits, which the administration expanded in 2025 so election officials could run entire voter rolls against it in bulk, including by Social Security number. What the ruling does is let DHS switch that back on while the litigation runs.

What it cannot do is produce a purge before November, because federal law already forbids one. The National Voter Registration Act bars systematic removal of voters from the rolls within 90 days of a federal election. The midterms are November 3. The 90-day window closed in early August. Officials can check an individual voter’s citizenship in that window, and they can queue up bulk results for later, but the mass removal both sides described cannot legally happen until after the polls close.

What was true underneath. The tool’s error rate, which is the part neither headline mentioned. ProPublica found the expanded SAVE system flagging citizens as noncitizens in at least five states. In Texas it flagged hundreds of people who had registered through the Department of Public Safety, which requires proof of citizenship to register in the first place. The ruling’s real effect lands in 2027 and 2028, when the quiet period lifts and states can act on bulk matches. That is when the false-positive rate becomes the whole story, and it is a better use of attention now than a purge that the calendar rules out.

Kill Notes #06: The Truck Strike, the Politico Money, the Alien Injuries, and the Horse in the Beef

Tom Wellborn — Sun, 20 Sep 2026 16:12:24 GMT

Last week’s pattern was true numbers carrying false words. This week runs the other way. All four claims below are false, and a reader who stops at “false” walks away with less than the rumor gave them, because in every case the rumor was built on top of a real fact that is still sitting there after the debunk. The job this week is to keep the fact after throwing away the claim.

The October 1 truck strike

The claim, all over Facebook, Instagram, X, and TikTok since mid-September: truck drivers across the country will stop driving on October 1 to protest diesel prices, and shelves will be empty within days. Several of the videos tell viewers to stock up on six months of food.

What happened when it was checked. No union, trade group, or identifiable organizer has called a strike. The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, which represents the independent truckers most likely to be squeezed, called it “social media chatter.” The Teamsters have said nothing to support it. Snopes looked on September 17 and found no evidence of any planned action. Several of the accounts pushing it are monetized, which is its own explanation.

What was true underneath. The price of diesel. The Energy Information Administration’s survey for the week of September 14 put the national average for on-highway diesel at $6.285 a gallon, a record, up 31.8 cents in a single week and up 68 percent from a year ago. The West Coast averaged $7.25, and California passed $8. Federal regulators have extended hours-of-service waivers through December 16 because fuel delivery itself is under strain. J.B. Hunt’s truckload division swung to an operating loss.

The strike is fiction, but the conditions that would make a strike plausible are documented in a federal data series. Nobody has to stockpile six months of food. People should expect the price of everything that rides on a truck to follow diesel, and nearly everything rides on a truck, and that will arrive without anyone walking off the job.

Kill Notes #05: Sixty Trees, Five Thousand Dollars, Half the Polling Places, and the Ten Percent That Became a Certainty

Tom Wellborn — Sun, 13 Sep 2026 20:39:44 GMT

This installment has a through-line, and it’s a specific kind of error. Not a made-up figure. A true figure, carried out of the document it came from and set down next to a noun that changes what it means. Sixty trees became sixty cherry trees. A campaign promise became a crime. A proposal became a vote. A probability became a prediction. The numbers all check. The sentences don’t.

The sixty cherry trees

The claim, everywhere for a week: the Trump administration cut down sixty cherry blossom trees in Washington to build a golf course.

What happened when it was checked. The Washington Post reported that about sixty trees were removed from East Potomac Park, in what the Department of the Interior called routine maintenance. The Post article mentions one cherry tree. One. An advocacy group opposed to changes at the park told FactCheck.org it knew for certain of one cherry tree being cut, and no more.

What was true underneath. Sixty trees came down. The species that made it a story, the one that turns a maintenance crew into a desecration, is documented in exactly one case. The sixty is real. The cherry is a rounding error that happened to be the entire point. If you want to be angry about East Potomac Park, be angry about the fifty-nine trees nobody bothered to identify, because that’s the actual story and nobody told it.

Subscribe now

Kill Notes #04: The Forged Map, the Chef, and the Thing Steinem Said Herself in 1967

Tom Wellborn — Sun, 06 Sep 2026 13:50:58 GMT

All three items this week come apart the same way, and it is worth saying how before starting.

Each claim points at a source, whether a seventeenth-century map, a former White House chef, or a newspaper report from the Johnson administration, and in each case the source is real, is available, and sits in a public archive that anyone with a browser can open. The claim survives because nobody opens it. That is the mechanism this week, and it is a more hopeful one than last week’s, because it means the correction is a link rather than an argument.

Item one. The map that proves the lake was always Lake America.

The claim, circulating on X, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Threads since the end of August, is that an old French map of the Great Lakes labels the water at the bottom of the chain “Lac America,” and that the president therefore restored an original name rather than inventing one. The most-shared version on X drew about 73,700 views and 3,700 likes, with a caption saying Trump was just correcting what it was called a very long time ago.

Kill Notes #03: The Trump Quote Everyone Got Wrong, and the UFO Poll Everyone Read Backwards

Tom Wellborn — Sun, 30 Aug 2026 12:41:23 GMT

Both items this week have the same shape, which is worth naming before either of them starts.

In each case something real happened, and then a more shareable version of it went out ahead, and the more shareable version is the one that got the traffic. Neither is a hoax. Nobody invented either story from nothing. What happened in both is smaller and more common than a hoax, and considerably harder to correct: an improvement was made, the improvement traveled, and the underlying thing was left behind.

Item one. The dumb, stupid country.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

The claim, circulating on X and Facebook since midweek, is that the president said this: that we were a dumb, stupid country, led by a very, very stupid person, a year ago.

The joke writes itself, and thousands of people wrote it, because a year ago was January 2026 and he has been president since January 2025. The quote appears to be a sitting president describing his own administration, and the memes built on it were still going out on Tuesday.

Subscribe now

Kill Notes #02

Tom Wellborn — Sat, 22 Aug 2026 16:16:41 GMT

Four this week. As always, these are claims you are likely to encounter, not pieces I am embarrassed about.

The Cohen interview does not help the appeal

You have seen this one by now. Michael Cohen interviewed Donald Trump on his radio show, and the framing across most of the coverage, sourced originally to Maggie Haberman on CNN, is that some people in the White House believe Cohen speaking out about the trial could be useful to the appeal.

I was going to repeat that. Then I looked at what the appeal actually is.

The live question is not whether Cohen told the truth. It is whether the case belongs in federal court under the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity decision. The Second Circuit revived that issue in November and sent it back to Judge Hellerstein, and the specific dispute on remand is whether prosecutors crossed a line by putting testimony from Hope Hicks and Madeleine Westerhout, both former White House aides, in front of the jury. That is the evidence that might qualify as official acts.

Cohen’s testimony was never part of that question. The payments were private conduct, which is the exact ground on which Hellerstein twice refused to move the case.

So a witness announcing that he felt pressured cannot touch it. It is not an argument the appeal contains.

Subscribe now

Kill Notes #01

Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:36:06 GMT

This is new, and it is only going to paid subscribers, so let me explain what it is before I get into it.

I kill a lot of pieces. Most weeks I start research on something, find that the premise does not survive the evidence, and stop. That work does not appear anywhere. It just quietly does not become an article, and you have no way of knowing it happened.

I have come to think that is the wrong instinct. What gets rejected, and why, says more about whether you can trust the things that do run than any individual piece does. So from now on the ones that die get written up here.

There is a second reason, which is more useful to you. Most of what I kill dies because a claim circulating online turns out to be wrong, and those claims do not stop circulating just because I declined to repeat them. You are probably going to encounter them. You should know what is underneath them.

Three this time.